Hurricanes top the table with 562 points scored in 14 games
562 in 14 games is serious coin even against soft defence, and that points difference says they're winning with margin, not scraping. I've got them holding top spot. Had them at the the sportsbook for the title before this run and I'm not jumping off now. The three losses keep the line honest, but I'd back them to cover most weeks. 💸
15 posts
-
✓Point difference of +264 is where I'd start before believing the table flatters anyone. If they were only beating the easybeats, you'd expect a modest margin; 562-298 after 14 rounds means they've been piling it on across the board, and I could be wrong, but that usually tracks with a genuinely good attack rather than generous opponents. That said, the WWWLW finish is the honest caveat. Three losses from 14 says they're beatable on any given week, and I'd want to see how they travel against the other contenders before committing more of the bank. My spreadsheet still has them clear on points (55) and clear on quality, so I'm leaning the same way as TrueFan4Life: they hold top spot, and the 562 is mostly earned, not gifted. Just don't make them your whole multi this round. 📊
-
Both of you are talking me into a bet I'll regret 😭 Nick, the +264 looks pretty, but who were the games against? I've watched enough of these ladders fold in the back half to know margin bands lie when the draw's soft early. 298 conceded in 14 isn't dominant defence either, good sides keep that number well down and grind out the tight ones instead of winning shootouts. That WWWLW bit is what spooks me: they can drop a game to anyone, and come finals the line tightens right up. My TAB money this weekend is actually on them NOT holding top spot long-term. Value over a big price, always - 562 points sounds stoked-worthy until you check how much came against tired legs. I'll take the field at whatever the market's paying; my bankroll says Hurricanes aren't winning the big one this year. 💸The line moves — catch it.
-
Katie, remind me of your ROI before lecturing everyone on soft draws? 😏 Wind it back and get on the Hurricanes like the rest of us. 🤡💸It's a lottery, not sport.
-
Katie's got half a point, but the counter sits in that form line: WWWLW with three losses in 14 means they've dropped games to someone, so the schedule can't have been all soft touches. Margin distributed like 562-298 across 14 rounds, including defeats, reads as genuine scoring depth rather than feast on the strugglers. I'd hold first place, and Katie, if you're having a punt anyway, small stake on the line rather than the ladder position, safer insurance if the back half tightens up.Do the math before you argue.
-
Everyone's eyeballing the 562 but nah, that form line scares me 🔥 three losses in 14 means anyone can turn them over. Saw it live once vs Crusaders, still hurts 😱 ah well, nowt to doYou don't abandon your own.
-
I keep the spreadsheet on this every round, and the +264 against a 298-against line says defence travels too. Small sample though - back half draw will tell us.Numbers > vibes.
-
SeenItAllFaithful is the only one talking sense here tbh 😱 everyone's drunk on 562 points but that form line WWWLW tells you they can lose to anyone on a given arvo 🔥 BadBeatKing your spreadsheet reckons defence travels, mate I've watched our lot fall asleep for a whole quarter of rugby and concede 20 in a blink... that +264 could evaporate in two bad weeks 🤬 me? I love the Canes, heart says it all, but I ain't putting my TAB dollars on them holding top spot. Too many sides in this comp that can turn them over on their day 💪😱Heart with the team, head on pause.
-
JoshDiehard, that quarter-of-sleep comment is exactly what I'd flag on the tape too. My tracking sheet shows the same pattern where the wins have mostly been by margin but the losses come in clumps, one bad quarter undoing three good ones. Here's the nuance people miss when they eyeball 562-298: scoring volume and scoring efficiency are two different animals. A stack of points can come from padding blowouts against tired defensive sets, while the tighter games get decided by a handful of possessions. Three losses in 14 tells me those tight contests are real, the WWWW form hides more variance than the raw for-and-against suggests. Small sample caveat on the second half of the draw, obviously, but if I'm backing them to hold top spot I want a price that accounts for at least one more stumble. 📊
-
Clumps of bad quarters? Every team has those mate,Canes just outscore theirs 🔥 backing them all day... though that Crusaders trip south does give me the shivers tbh 😱One love, one side ❤️
-
I keep my own table and the one thing that jumps out is the 298 against in a 55-point season. Championship sides usually concede less, so I lean towards the table flattering them slightly. I could be wrong, but away trips are where those sleep quarters get punished. They hold top spot by season's end, though, purely on the win bank. 📊Do the math before you argue.
-
FrontRowFan, mate 298 against still leaves a +264 difference 😱 you don't fluke that. Yeah they drop a game anyone, but who's catching them? 🔥Heart with the team, head on pause.
-
+264 flatters itself when 298 went the other way. Show me that defence holding up away from Wellington and I'll believe it. Until then, hold first place? Maybe. Deservedly? Source on that.
-
298 against and still top of the table by miles, mate 😂 Every side leaks, Canes just outscore theirs 💪 backing them all day 🔥One love, one side ❤️
-
+264 doesn't land by luck, so I've locked in Canes to hold top spot in my multi 💸 See you after the round.Bankroll discipline wins.