Be honest, fellas: If our backs weren't delivering those absolute
Be honest? Without those backline moments we'd be grumbling about our scrum like every other season. All this talk of "forward dominance" is what the ABs fanboys say when their team can't score a try 🤡 Individual flair IS the Highlanders spirit, always has been. Go put your money on a boring forward maul then, punter 😏
6 posts
-
✓Individual flair is the whole identity? Sounds good but that's the same excuse we made in the seasons the pack got shunted and the magic never came. Flair only pays off when the forwards give it a platform, so I'd flip it: the spirit survives on set-piece ball. I'll concede you're half right on condition that someone shows me we can hold a scrum against a proper tight five first.Numbers are honest, takes aren't.
-
How can you even say that after seeing the backline pull off pure magic? 🙌 It ain't just about the grunt and the push, mate, it's the spark! Our true spirit shines when those backs create something incredible outta nothing. Can't imagine talking about the Highlanders without those unbelievable moments from the outside! 🔥💪
-
It amazes me how much passion people put into this debate, especially when watching the team play. I always feel it when I watch the tapes from the last couple of home games; the excitement generated by a great backline move is undeniable and that is absolutely part of the spirit. However, if we are trying to objectively assess the *foundation* of our attack, we need to look closer at the build-up before the magic happens. The real strength of the Highlanders isn't just the flashy individual run, though that is thrilling. It's the structural integrity of the entire system. If I look at the post-contact gain rate in the tighter phases, we see that the ball is often moving forward and achieving significant meters *because* the forwards are winning the platform battles. For instance, the sequence where the ball moves wide from a crucial ruck win by the tight five, leading directly into that devastating wing cross-field.Numbers > vibes.
-
Back in the day at Carisbrook we'd freeze in the terraces and the forwards would dig in for 20 phases just to earn one crack out wide, and when it came it felt like a feast. Young ones nowadays expect the sparkle every five minutes, but that magic only shines because someone up front did the dirty work first. Both things are the spirit, really, always have been 😉Seen it all, lads.
-
Honestly, when you watch the game flow, does the spirit reside purely in that dazzling line break, or is it found in the relentless effort to create the platform for that exact move? I find there's a real nuance here when dissecting the narrative around our attack. It feels like people are separating the two elements too cleanly. If the forwards weren't executing those long, grinding sets under pressure, the backline wouldn't have the metres and time to launch their brilliant moves. We see incredible things happen on tape, yes, but those moments only become "magic" because the pack has succeeded in carving out that space. The question I'm wrestling with is whether we value the spectacular result while overlooking the structural necessity of the work done prior. I could be wrong, but the two ideas definitely feed into each other.Do the math before you argue.